Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41970083›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Zinner Syndrome: An Incidental Finding.

Pedro Serrano, Pedro Barros, Ana Sofia Moreira, Marco Dores, Aníbal Coutinho

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pedro SerranoDepartment of Urology, Hospital de Faro, Faro, PRT.
Pedro BarrosDepartment of Urology, Hospital de Faro, Faro, PRT.
Ana Sofia MoreiraDepartment of Radiology, Hospital de Faro, Faro, PRT.
Marco DoresDepartment of Urology, Hospital de Faro, Faro, PRT.
Aníbal CoutinhoDepartment of Urology, Hospital de Faro, Faro, PRT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The authors present a case of a 56-year-old man referred to the urology clinic after an incidental finding on abdominal ultrasound. Imaging revealed an oval cystic lesion adjacent to the right seminal vesicle, initially interpreted as a probable atrophic ectopic kidney. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed right renal agenesis, ipsilateral seminal vesicle cyst, and probable ejaculatory duct obstruction. A small intralesional nodular component was identified. The patient was asymptomatic, with preserved renal function and a prostate-specific antigen of 0.9 ng/mL. A transrectal biopsy was performed due to the suspicious nodule. Histopathological analysis demonstrated seminal vesicle/ejaculatory duct tissue with stromal edema lined by a single-layer cuboidal epithelium (CK7+, 34BE12+, PAX8+, PSA-, CK20-) and low Ki-67 (<1%), with no evidence of malignancy. Conservative management with imaging surveillance was adopted. Follow-up MRI at six-month intervals showed lesion stability. The patient remains asymptomatic, emphasizing the role of imaging in the diagnosis, assessment, and monitoring of asymptomatic Zinner syndrome.

Indexed as

magnetic resonance imagingrenal agenesisseminal vesicle cystwolffian ductzinner syndrome

Identifiers

PMID41970083
PMCPMC13065256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.