ArticleCureus2026
A Retrospective Audit of Healthcare-Associated Infections in Patients Who Are Optimised for Discharge at a Tertiary Medical Centre.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background This audit aimed to identify patients who developed a healthcare-associated infection (HCAI) after being deemed medically optimised for discharge and to then recognise the common patterns of HCAIs alongside the reasons for delays in discharges. Methodology This audit used a retrospective observational design. The audit was conducted in a general medical ward in an NHS England tertiary medical centre between December 2023 and January 2024. The study had a sample size of 93 patients who had been deemed medically optimised for discharge (MOFD) in a general medical ward but had not yet been discharged. The main outcome measures of the audit were the type and period prevalence of HCAI and the reasons for delay in discharge. Results In total, 93 patients were determined to be MOFD, with 11 (12%) suffering HCAI. The study identified COVID-19 as the most prevalent HCAI, accounting for four (36.4%) cases, followed by three (27.3%) cases of urinary catheter-related infections, two (18.2%) cases of hospital-acquired pneumonia not related to COVID-19, and two (18.2%) cases of other infections. The study also identified that delays in discharge for patients were mainly due to waits for social care. Overall, 64% (seven patients) of patients had a delay in discharge because of delays in social care, followed by 36% (four patients) due to ongoing therapy needs. Conclusions This audit links delays in social care to adverse health outcomes in hospitals. Immediate measures are needed to strengthen social care provisions within hospitals to improve health care outcomes in an increasingly aging population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.