Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41970075›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Anaemia Among School-Going Adolescent Girls in India: A Systematic Review of Prevalence, Predictors, and Prevention Pathways.

Sagarika Duggirala, Saptarishi Bose, Revathi Devi Karuturi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sagarika DuggiralaCommunity Medicine, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, IND.
Saptarishi BoseCommunity Medicine, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, IND.
Revathi Devi KaruturiChild Health, Sudhir Heart Centre, Berhampur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaemia remains a major public health challenge among adolescent girls in India, with persistently high prevalence despite long-standing national nutrition programmes. School-going adolescent girls represent a critical subgroup due to increased physiological iron requirements during adolescence and the long-term consequences for growth, cognition, and future maternal health. This systematic review, conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, synthesised evidence from studies published between January 2010 and December 2024 across major databases and grey literature sources. Observational and interventional studies reporting anaemia prevalence, predictors, or preventive strategies among school-going adolescent girls (10-19 years) in India were included. Eleven studies comprising national surveys and regional school-based investigations were analysed. Reported anaemia prevalence ranged from approximately 40% to over 70%, with consistently higher burden in socioeconomically disadvantaged and high-risk regions. Key determinants included inadequate dietary iron intake, menstrual blood loss, poor sanitation, helminthic infections, and suboptimal adherence to iron-folic acid supplementation programmes. Evidence suggests that integrated school-based interventions combining supplementation, nutrition education, and screening are more effective than single-component strategies. Overall, anaemia among school-going adolescent girls in India remains a persistent and inequitable public health problem, requiring strengthened implementation of context-specific, school-based prevention strategies and improved programme monitoring.

Indexed as

adolescent girlsanaemiaindiairon deficiencypublic healthschool health

Identifiers

PMID41970075
PMCPMC13064352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.