ReviewCureus2026
Adapting Pediatric Anesthesia Education to Generation Z Learners: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric anesthesiology is a subspecialty with high complexity requiring advanced technical skills, rapid decision-making, and empathetic communication. Children present with distinct physiological and anatomical vulnerabilities, and several studies suggest that traditional training models largely based on observation and supervised participation may not consistently provide sufficient hands-on exposure, particularly for rare but critical events. Concurrently, a generational shift has reshaped medical education, with Generation Z (Gen Z) trainees demonstrating preferences for interactive, technology-supported, and feedback-rich learning environments. This narrative review, based on a focused synthesis of literature from PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar (2000-2025), integrates evidence from both pediatric anesthesia-specific studies and broader medical education literature to examine how contemporary educational strategies align with evolving learner characteristics. Findings suggest that the most effective approach is not reliance on any single innovation but a thoughtful integration of experiential learning, structured simulation, digital reinforcement, and mentorship within competency-based frameworks. When implemented alongside supervised clinical exposure, these approaches may enhance skill acquisition, engagement, and preparedness. Aligning pediatric anesthesia education with modern learning science and generational needs is, therefore, timely and necessary. Carefully designed learner-centered training models may strengthen competency development while upholding ethical principles such as "training without harm," ultimately preparing anesthesiologists to deliver safe, compassionate, and high-quality care to children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.