ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Efficacy and safety of adjunctive clobazam in Chinese patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: a single-center real-world study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clobazam in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy: from pharmacology to clinical practice.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjunctive clobazam (CLB) in Chinese patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Methods: We retrospectively included 121 DRE patients receiving adjunctive CLB at the Epilepsy Center of the Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Jan 2023-May 2025). Patients were followed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months or longer. Data collected included epilepsy etiology, seizure type, frequency, treatment duration, dosage, and adverse events. Response was defined as ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline. Results: A total of 121 patients were included (age at medication use 32.4 ± 13.5 years; mean three prior failed antiseizure medications; mean follow-up 12 months). Seizure types were focal (18.2%), generalized (7.4%), and both (74.4%). At first follow-up, 51.2% achieved ≥50% seizure reduction and 39.7% were seizure freedom; at last follow-up, 85.9% responded and 51.6% were seizure freedom. Response rates increased over time (all Conclusion: Adjunctive CLB significantly reduced seizures in DRE with sustained efficacy. Higher dosage, longer treatment duration, and concomitant OXC use were associated with improved outcomes. CLB showed favorable efficacy, wide applicability, and acceptable safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.