ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Global Patterns of Myopia, Age, Sex, and Vision Loss: A Comparative Analysis of US and South Korean National Surveys.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Myopia prevalence is rising globally and has reached critical levels in some regions. Beyond refractive correction needs, myopia is a major risk factor for irreversible, vision-threatening ocular disease. This study investigated the relationship between myopia, age, sex, and visual impairment in 2 nationally representative populations in the United States and South Korea. Design: A cross-sectional analysis using data from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Participants: Participants in the NHANES and KNHANES. Methods: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and noncycloplegic refractive error were analyzed from NHANES (1999-2008) and KNHANES (2008-2022), excluding those with cataract or refractive surgery. Visual impairment was defined as BCVA ≥0.30 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to evaluate and visualize the cumulative risk of visual impairment by refractive error age and sex. Main Outcome Measures: Visual impairment probability and the odds ratios (ORs) for visual impairment by region, age, and degree of myopia. Results: Visual impairment rates increased with both myopia severity and age in both populations. Among younger nonmyopes, impairment affected 1%, rising to 50% in high myopes by age 75. High myopes had up to 13-fold higher odds of visual impairment than nonmyopes. Age-related risks were similar across regions, but myopia had a stronger effect in South Korea: each 1 D increase in myopia raised the odds of impairment by 41% versus 27% in the United States. Sex was not a significant factor in the United States ( Conclusions: Myopia substantially increases the risk of visual impairment in both the United States and South Korea, with risk rising proportionally with myopia severity. Age-related effects were similar across cohorts, though myopia exerted a greater influence in South Korea. Females demonstrated higher rates of visual impairment independently of refractive error. These findings highlight myopia as a global health concern, reinforcing the need for prevention and early intervention to reduce lifetime risk across all severities. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.