Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41970002›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2025

JAGRITI (ಜಾಗೃತಿ) - A study on enhancement of health communication for sickle cell disease (SCD) among Soliga Indigenous community in Chamarajanagar, Karnataka: Study protocol.

Praveen Srinivasa Rao, Padmakumar K, Achyutha Nagaragadde, Deepa Bhat, Yogish Channa Basappa, Tanya Seshadri, Manjula Venkataraghavan, Upendra M Bhojani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Praveen Srinivasa RaoCentre for Adivasi Health, Public and Policy Engagement Unit, Institute of Public Health Bengaluru, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560070, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1001-4447
Padmakumar KManipal Institute of Communication, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Manipal, Karnataka, 576 104, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7753-0865
Achyutha NagaragaddeCentre for Commercial Determinants of Health, Institute of Public Health Bengaluru, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560070, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0087-6146
Deepa BhatJSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, 570015, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4928-1718
Yogish Channa BasappaCentre for Adivasi Health, Public and Policy Engagement Unit, Institute of Public Health Bengaluru, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560070, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5045-5121
Tanya SeshadriCentre for Adivasi Health, Public and Policy Engagement Unit, Institute of Public Health Bengaluru, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560070, India.
Manjula VenkataraghavanManipal Institute of Communication, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Manipal, Karnataka, 576 104, India.
Upendra M BhojaniCentre for Adivasi Health, Public and Policy Engagement Unit, Institute of Public Health Bengaluru, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560070, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9179-6248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) is a genetic disorder that disproportionately affects Indigenous populations. Tailored awareness and management strategies are crucial for reducing the prevalence of SCD and improving its management. Existing awareness campaigns are inadequate and are often devoid of cultural appropriateness, local language, and evidence-based content/design. There is a dearth of knowledge on what constitutes effective health communication for these communities. Objectives: This study aims to examine existing SCD-related knowledge, its sources, and the health communication-supportive infrastructure among the Soliga community in the Chamarajanagar district of Karnataka. It will identify any established health communication strategies used for and/or by Indigenous communities, assessing their strengths and limitations. Additionally, the study seeks to understand community preferences for health communication, including language, content, and delivery. Insights from these findings will guide the development of a comprehensive and practical health communication guide for SCD. Method: The study employs a mixed-methods approach following the triangulation design by Creswell and Plano Clark (2007). The study begins with a community-based survey to assess existing SCD knowledge, information sources, and communication-supportive infrastructure within the Soliga community. Next, a scoping review will identify global health communication strategies for Indigenous populations, supplemented by Focus Group Discussions with community stakeholders to explore preferences for culturally appropriate communication methods. The insights from these stages will guide the development of a comprehensive, evidence-based guide for effective SCD-related health communication tailored to Indigenous populations. Discussion: This study explores ways to advance culturally appropriate, evidence-based health communication strategies. It will address the knowledge gap in effective SCD communication for Indigenous communities by emphasising the role of community preferences. This study's outcomes aim to guide future health communication campaigns, ultimately enhancing SCD awareness and management among Indigenous populations.

Indexed as

Adivasi communityAwarenessCommunity engagementCommunity EngagementHaemoglobinopathiesHealth CommunicationHealth EducationHealth informationIndigenousSCDSickle Cell DiseaseSoliga communityTribal Population

Identifiers

PMID41970002
PMCPMC13062772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.