ArticleMethodsX2026
SeedlingNet: A colour-based segmentation approach towards classification of plant species seedlings.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early identification of plant species in uncontrolled conditions can be complex due to the complex background and morphological diversity of a plant's leaves. Agriculture plays an important role in our daily life to produce food, develop economies, international trade, research, and promote global sustainability. In this work, classification of plant species is performed based on a proposed segmentation method using a colour thresholding technique to separate the plant regions in images captured in low lighting and a complex background. The models include DenseNet121, NasNet Mobile, MobileNet, RegNet, and XceptionNet, trained on the proposed segmentation method and raw image samples, and compared for their effectiveness. The dataset, comprising 4750 images of 12 different types of plants, their seedlings, and weeds, is sourced from Kaggle. The results demonstrate that the model's classification performance using the proposed segmentation method consistently outperformed with the non-segmented images, confirming the need for segmentation to improve model accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.