ArticleNoro psikiyatri arsivi2026
The Role of Metacognitive Processes in Personality Traits: A Dimensional Perspective Based on the DSM-5 Alternative Model.
Article in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study examined the relationships between maladaptive personality traits, as conceptualized within the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD), and metacognitive processes in a non-clinical adult sample. Methods: The sample consisted of 275 adults aged 18-65 years recruited from non-psychiatric outpatient clinics. Participants completed the Personality Inventory for DSM-5, the Metacognitions Questionnaire-30, the Metacognitive Strategies subscale of the Cognitive Attentional Syndrome-1 questionnaire, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7. Pearson correlation analyses were conducted to examine associations between variables, and hierarchical multiple regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationships between metacognitive factors and personality traits while accounting for depression and anxiety symptoms. Results: Correlation analyses revealed significant associations between maladaptive personality traits and metacognitive variables, with distinct patterns observed across different personality dimensions. Regression analyses showed that several metacognitive factors remained significantly related to specific personality traits after controlling for depression and anxiety. In particular, the Need to Control Thoughts was associated with Antagonism, Disinhibition, and Psychoticism, whereas beliefs regarding the uncontrollability and danger of worry and metacognitive coping strategies were related to Negative Affectivity. Metacognitive factors showed limited associations with Detachment. Conclusion: The findings suggest that metacognitive processes are meaningfully related to maladaptive personality traits and that these associations extend beyond general emotional distress. Metacognitive characteristics, particularly those involving attempts to regulate and control internal experiences, may represent relevant processes for understanding personality-related difficulties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.