Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41969909›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Problematic social media use and psychosocial conditions.

Håkan Stattin, Charli Eriksson, Einar B Thorsteinsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Håkan StattinUppsala University, Department of Psychology, Uppsala, Sweden.
Charli ErikssonKarolinska Institutet, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Stockholm, Sweden.
Einar B ThorsteinssonUniversity of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Problematic social media use (PSMU) is frequently associated with adolescent mental health problems, but the interpretive meaning of a high PSMU score in population surveys remains unclear. We examined whether elevated PSMU identifies adolescents with broader psychosocial difficulties or appears in multiple psychosocial contexts. Methods: Cluster analysis was conducted using data from the 2022 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) survey, including nationally representative samples of 15-year-old adolescents (mean age 15.80 years, SD 0.41) from five Nordic countries ( Results: Adolescents with high PSMU, psychosomatic complaints, and perceived stress showed the most adverse psychosocial profile, including cyberbullying involvement, negative school and peer experiences, loneliness, and low well-being. Adolescents with high psychosomatic complaints and perceived stress but average PSMU showed equal or greater difficulties, except for cyberbullying. A third group reported high PSMU without elevated perceived stress or psychosomatic complaints and did not show elevated psychosocial difficulties on the measured indicators. Conclusion: High PSMU scores occurred in heterogeneous psychosocial contexts. Adolescents with high PSMU were distributed across markedly different psychosocial profiles, and those with the most adverse stress-related conditions were often identified without elevated PSMU. These findings suggest that PSMU should be interpreted cautiously when used as a stand-alone indicator in adolescent population surveys and that its meaning depends on accompanying stress-related symptoms and social context.

Indexed as

adolescentscluster analysiscyberbullyingdigital media usemental health indicatorsperson-centered analysisproblematic social media use (PSMU)psychosocial maladjustment

Identifiers

PMID41969909
PMCPMC13067289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.