ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
The algorithmic self: reimagining conscious leadership in posthuman education: toward a posthuman ethics of educational awareness.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence into educational systems is reshaping how leadership, decision-making, and institutional accountability are enacted. While existing research on AI and educational leadership often focuses on governance, efficiency, and data-driven management, less attention has been given to the ontological and ethical implications of algorithmic mediation. This paper addresses this gap by developing a conceptual model of conscious leadership grounded in posthuman philosophy, transpersonal psychology, and relational leadership theory. Using a conceptual synthesis methodology, the study introduces the notion of the algorithmic self to describe a relational configuration of awareness emerging at the intersection of human cognition and technological mediation. The proposed model integrates psychological depth, ethical reflexivity, and technological attunement as interdependent dimensions of leadership practice within AI-mediated environments. Rather than positioning technology as either a threat or a solution, the framework situates leadership within hybrid human-machine systems where agency and responsibility are dynamically negotiated. The article contributes to theoretical discussions in educational leadership and philosophical psychology by reframing leadership as a relational and ethically mediated process shaped by socio-technical infrastructures. It further connects posthuman ethics with evolutionary cognition, suggesting that leadership in the algorithmic age involves both ethical reflection and cognitive adaptation within complex digital ecologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.