ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Adolescent wellbeing after COVID-related school-closings.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Research has shown that the COVID-19 pandemic and related lockdowns led to increased loneliness and decreased life-satisfaction among adolescents. However, the impact was not uniform, suggesting that certain resources may have served as protective factors. This study adopts a resource-based perspective to identify predictors of adolescent well-being after and at the end of the second COVID-related lockdown, focusing on self-efficacy, social support, and religiosity, as well as the role of a disposition to help. Methods: Using data from a longitudinal sample of 171 German-speaking adolescents aged 15-18 y., assessed at four time points over 6 months, we analyzed which resources during the lockdown period were associated with life-satisfaction and loneliness at the final assessment. Results: Our findings indicate that self-efficacy and general social support were significant predictors of higher life-satisfaction, while peer support uniquely predicted reduced loneliness. Parental support also positively influenced life satisfaction when general social support was excluded from the analyses. Discussion: The findings underscore the crucial role of peers and family as primary sources of support during the pandemic, even in contexts of physical distancing. This study highlights the need to differentiate between types of social support and distinct aspects of well-being, such as life-satisfaction and loneliness. It underscores self-efficacy and peer support as central resources for fostering resilience in adolescents during crises. These insights provide valuable guidance for developing targeted prevention and intervention programs to strengthen adolescents' resources and support systems in preparation for future disruptions or lockdown scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.