Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41969875›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

A dogs-at-work program in a veterinary college: promoting workplace wellbeing and resilience.

Emilie M MacInnis, Niwako Ogata, Leanne O Nieforth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emilie M MacInnisDepartment of Comparative Pathobiology, Human-Animal Partnerships and Interactions Lab, Center for the Human-Animal Bond, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.
Niwako OgataDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Center for the Human-Animal Bond, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.
Leanne O NieforthDepartment of Comparative Pathobiology, Human-Animal Partnerships and Interactions Lab, Center for the Human-Animal Bond, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dogs-at-work (DAW) programs may be able to take advantage of the benefits of human-animal interactions to support the resilience and wellbeing of employees in high stress workplaces, but research in this area is limited. Consequently, employers are often hesitant to implement these programs. To expand our understanding and support implementation of these programs, this study uses the Resilience Portfolio Model to explore how wellbeing and resilience differ between veterinary staff, based on participation in a long-standing dogs-at-work program. An online survey consisting of open-ended questions about participants' perceptions and experiences with the program, and validated measures of mental health and work-related wellbeing, was distributed to faculty and staff eligible to participate in the DAW program. Results demonstrated that the 23 DAW participants and 65 non-participants were comparable across nearly all wellbeing measures, in alignment with population norms. Qualitative coding revealed four themes for perceptions and experiences with the DAW program and participating dogs: (1) an increase in social interactions, (2) improvements in mental health, (3) opportunities for physical activity, and (4) recommendations for program logistics. In line with the Resilience Portfolio Model, meaning-making, regulatory, interpersonal, and environmental strengths were all represented in the findings. Taken together, results indicated that veterinary staff perceived benefits from interacting with dogs at work and may draw resilience-supporting strengths from these interactions. Results also highlighted practical opportunities for program improvement, including equitable access and long-term program management needs.

Indexed as

companion animalhuman-animalveterinary staffworkplace resilienceworkplace wellbeing

Identifiers

PMID41969875
PMCPMC13062298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.