ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Is generative artificial intelligence literacy important? A study on the factors influencing teacher's professional flourishing.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) usage patterns on employee creativity.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study, based on the theoretical frameworks of self-determination theory and social support theory, uses a stratified random sampling method and a questionnaire survey to collect data from 499 university teachers at a public university in Jinan. It innovatively explores the impact of personal ability factors, such as generative artificial intelligence literacy, and external support factors on teachers' sense of professional flourishing. Through mediation analysis, the study reveals that teachers' professional flourishing is influenced not only by external support factors such as the research atmosphere, teaching atmosphere, and organizational emotional support but also by internal factors, including teaching efficiency and generative artificial intelligence literacy. Furthermore, the study identifies four mediating pathways. Generative artificial intelligence literacy significantly improves teachers' professional flourishing by enhancing teaching efficiency, while the research atmosphere, teaching atmosphere, and organizational emotional support also indirectly promote teachers' professional flourishing through increased teaching efficiency. This study provides a new perspective for educational practice, revealing the importance of the collaborative effect of both internal and external factors, such as generative artificial intelligence literacy, on teachers' professional flourishing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.