Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41969862›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Psychological mechanisms linking AI hallucinations to user trust and behavioral intentions toward AI-generated videos: an S-O-R perspective.

Jun Liu, Yue Sun, Kaiqi Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jun LiuCollege of Art, Cheongju University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Yue SunSchool of Design, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou, China.
Kaiqi XiaoCollege of Media, Tonghua Normal University, Tonghua, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the widespread adoption of AI-generated videos in media content production, their visual credibility and the associated issues of user trust have attracted increasing attention. Although AI-generated videos have become progressively more realistic, user-perceived visual anomalies (AI hallucinations) may elicit negative psychological responses, undermine trust, and ultimately shape behavioral intentions. Grounded in the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) framework, this study systematically examines how AI hallucinations influence perceived trust through uncanny valley eeriness and perceived realism, and how these effects further translate into behavioral intention. We manipulated three levels of AI hallucination (low, medium, and high) in AI-generated video stimuli and recruited 408 participants to view and evaluate the videos. Hypotheses were tested using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results indicate that AI hallucinations significantly increase uncanny valley eeriness and reduce perceived realism; both factors further affect behavioral intention via perceived trust, with perceived realism showing the strongest predictive effect on trust. Moreover, uncanny valley eeriness, perceived realism, perceived trust, and behavioral intention differed significantly across hallucination levels. These findings support the applicability of the S-O-R model in the context of viewing AI-generated videos and delineate a psychological transmission mechanism through which AI hallucinations shape trust judgments and behavioral responses via affective and cognitive processing, offering a new theoretical perspective on credibility construction in generative visual content.

Indexed as

AI-generated videoAI hallucinationbehavioral intentionperceived truststimulus–organism–response modeluncanny valley eeriness

Identifiers

PMID41969862
PMCPMC13067884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.