Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41969854›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Teacher emotional support and learning engagement: a sequential mediation model of basic psychological needs satisfaction and enjoyment.

Xiaolan Ye, Kun He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaolan YeSchool of Foreign Languages, Qiongtai Normal University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Kun HeSchool of Physical Education, Qiongtai Normal University, Haikou, Hainan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Based on Self-Determination Theory, this study explores the mechanism by which teacher emotional support (TES) influences learning engagement of English as a foreign language (EFL) students, focusing on the mediation roles of basic psychological needs (BPNs) satisfaction and foreign language enjoyment. Methods: A cross-sectional investigation was conducted with 442 EFL undergraduates in Hainan Province. Data were collected using validated scales measuring teacher emotional support, basic psychological needs satisfaction, foreign language enjoyment, and learning engagement. Path analysis and bootstrap analysis were conducted to test the hypothesized sequential mediation model. Results: Findings revealed teacher emotional support significantly positively predicted learning engagement (β = 0.258) and operated through three indirect pathways: (1) the primary mediating role of basic psychological needs satisfaction (β = 0.211); (2) the modest mediating role of foreign language enjoyment (Effect = 0.061); (3) the sequential mediating role of basic needs satisfaction and foreign language enjoyment (Effect = 0.048). The total indirect effect size is 0.319 and the total effect is 0.577. Conclusion: Teacher emotional support enhances EFL students' learning engagement through multiple pathways. The most potent of these is the satisfaction of basic psychological needs. Foreign language enjoyment also serves as a significant mediator. Furthermore, a sequential chain wherein need satisfaction fosters enjoyment, which in turn drives engagement, was empirically supported. This research underscores the importance of addressing both motivational and emotional channels to optimize EFL classroom instruction.

Indexed as

academic emotionacademic engagementBPNschain mediationforeign language enjoymentperceived teacher support

Identifiers

PMID41969854
PMCPMC13064612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.