ArticleFuture healthcare journal2026
Intimacy, rites and nuances: An in-depth discussion of the complexities and considerations in voluntary assisted dying in a UK and Australian context.
Article in Future healthcare journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Everybody's business: insights into palliative and end-of-life care for clinicians who treat mortals (yes, that means you).Future healthcare journal · 2026Article
- Let's talk about death and dying.Future healthcare journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This is a video article. The authors specifically request that it should therefore be viewed as such. There is a transcription available in the article for accessibility purposes. The video approaches the issue of voluntary assisted dying (VAD) through the lens of a moderated discussion. It explores insights into daily operation of a system and how it operates alongside palliative care services in the Australian state of New South Wales. The participants discuss how policy has become situated and covers themes of gender differences in those accessing VAD; coercion; ineligibility; conscientious objection; and the enablement of the 'urgency' that can accompany a final decision. It also reflects on the relevance of the wider health and social care systems in place, and their quality, when establishing a right to VAD. This article takes a non-traditional format and does not reach any specific conclusions or recommendations. It does allow for a detailed analysis of intricacies and challenges that few will have considered in their thinking. All expressed views are authors' own and not those of their affiliated institution.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.