ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2026
Adenoma detection rates during screening colonoscopy performed by interventional gastroenterologists and general gastroenterologists.
Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Interventional gastroenterologists typically perform colonoscopies at lower volumes than general gastroenterologists, and we sought to determine whether this disparity affects their overall adenoma detection rates (ADRs). Our study aimed to identify any difference in ADR between interventional gastroenterologists and general gastroenterologists. Methods: A retrospective cohort study from January 2020 to January 2023 was performed to determine ADRs for interventional gastroenterologists and general gastroenterologists at a single academic tertiary care center, as well as assessing for other quality indicators of screening colonoscopy. Results: We reviewed 9755 screening colonoscopies. On univariate analysis, ADR differed between groups (46.9% vs 41.5%, Conclusions: ADR was similar between interventional and general gastroenterologists after adjustment for patient characteristics, supporting inclusion of interventional gastroenterologists in colorectal cancer screening practices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.