ArticleiGIE : innovation, investigation and insights2026
Enhancing colonoscopy reporting quality: impact of structured templates and educational tutorials on automated adenoma detection rate reporting tool performance.
Article in iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a key colonoscopy quality metric. We previously created an automated ADR reporting tool, but inconsistent documentation hinders its quality. This study aims to evaluate the impact of structured colonoscopy report templates and educational tutorials on ADR metrics recorded by the reporting tool. Methods: We introduced structured colonoscopy report templates and an educational tutorial across 5 endoscopy centers. ADR-qualifying colonoscopies 120 days before and after intervention were analyzed. The Qlik analytics system-based automated ADR calculator (QlikTech Inc, King of Prussia, Pa, USA) was used to review screening colonoscopies and calculate ADR. Results: A total of 5382 colonoscopies were performed during the study period. Among 1436 ADR-qualifying colonoscopies, the reporting of ADR increased from 28.8% to 34.6% ( Conclusions: An increase in reporting of ADR was noted after the intervention period, with results durable up to 120 days after the intervention. However, multivariate analysis suggests the possibility of confounding factors beyond the intervention alone. Educational interventions on structured colonoscopy reporting improved quality metrics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.