ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2026
Long-term outcomes after intrepid dynamic exoskeletal orthosis treatment coupled with advanced rehabilitation.
Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Measuring satisfaction with orthotic and prosthetic devices.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To measure Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO) use patterns, return to work or return to duty, and amputation rate among patients undergoing limb salvage ≥2 years after discharge. Design: Telephone survey and retrospective medical chart review. Setting: Military tertiary care hospital and rehabilitation center. Patients/Participants: A total of 190 active duty or retired service members, military health care beneficiaries, and civilians aged 22 to 64 years old with traumatic lower limb injuries treated with an IDEO were invited to participate in a telephone survey. A total of 145 individuals (76.3% of those contacted) completed the survey. Main Outcome Measurements: IDEO use patterns, participation in the Return to Run (RTR) rehabilitation program, return to work or active duty, and elective amputation rate. Results: The most common initial diagnosis was lower limb fracture (54.5% of participants). The most common mechanism of injury was from explosive devices (22.8%). After IDEO prescription, 86.9% of respondents participated in the RTR program. Approximately 77.9% of patients returned to work; 67.3% of active duty IDEO users returned to active duty. At final follow-up (mean 90.3 ± 32.9 months, range 24.0-157.0 months), 80 patients (55.2%) still use their IDEO, whereas 14 patients (9.7%) had elected for amputation. Conclusions: Long-term IDEO use combined with the RTR rehabilitation program was associated with positive long-term outcomes as evidenced by a high self-reported activity level, high rate of return to work or duty, and low elective amputation rate among patients with severe lower limb injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.