Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41969747›Full record

Articlenpj digital public health2026

Topological modelling of urban air pollution and cognition.

Holger Engleitner, Marta Suárez Pinilla, Martin Rossor, Parashkev Nachev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj digital public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Holger EngleitnerUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Marta Suárez PinillaClinical Neuroscience Laboratory, Centre for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Martin RossorUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Parashkev NachevUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of air pollution on cognitive function has attracted repeated scrutiny, and current results point to a potentially detrimental role. The purpose of this study was to examine this association in geographic space. Cross-sectional, complete observational data from UK Biobank were extracted for the four metropolitan regions of Birmingham, Leeds, Liverpool and Manchester in England, UK, including three pollution indicators and two measures of cognitive performance. A set of additional covariates served to adjust for potential confounders. Spatial analyses for each region and combination of pollution indicator and cognition measure were conducted using mass-univariate linear regression in GeoSPM. Conventional non-spatial Bayesian regression models were used for comparison. A significant interaction between air pollution and cognitive performance was identified in 51 areas based on a two-tailed t-test at p < 0.05 FEW (voxel-level family-wise correction). In 29 of those areas, increased pollution and reduced cognition co-occur, and a pattern of central locations and primary roads emerges, suggesting a potentially harmful effect predicated by geography.

Indexed as

Epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID41969747
PMCPMC13061615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.