ArticleIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine2026
"Monthly Flower Blooms and Sheds off": Awareness, Hesitancy, and usage of Sustainable Menstrual Products among College Students of Pathanamthitta District, Kerala.
Article in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sustainable menstruation refers to using environment-friendly products such as menstrual cups, menstrual discs, period underwear, and reusable pads to benefit the nature around us and for our economic benefits. Although it has been several years since menstrual cups came into the market, there is a paucity of data related to their usage, awareness, and hesitancy in the Indian context. This study aims to explore the proportion of young adult menstruators who use sustainable menstrual products, the level of awareness and hesitancy in using these products, and the reasons associated with hesitancy. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1200 female college students in both medical and nonmedical colleges in Pathanamthitta District, Kerala. Among three medical colleges and 17 arts colleges in Pathanamthitta District, two medical colleges and four Arts colleges (clusters) were randomly selected and all students who were willing to provide consent for the study from the selected colleges were interviewed using a structured interview schedule. Results: The mean age of the students was 20.65 ± 3.2 years. The majority [88.8% (1065/1200)] of the students were aware of sustainable menstrual products. However, a vast majority, 94.25% (1131/1200), still used sanitary napkins, and only 5.75%, (69/1200) used menstrual cups. Despite having adequate knowledge about menstrual cups, only 33.6% (403/1200) were willing to switch from sanitary pads to menstrual cups. The reasons cited for hesitancy in using sustainable menstrual products like menstrual cups were fear of pain during insertion, anxiety, and lack of adequate knowledge and confidence in introducing a foreign body into the vagina. Conclusion: Most college students were well aware of sustainable menstrual products, including their environmental and economic advantages. Notably, all medical and nonmedical students who used menstrual cups (100%) reported that they made menstruation easier and more cost-effective and expressed willingness to continue their use. However, actual usage remains low, reflecting a gap between knowledge and practice. The reasons cited were anxiety and fear of pain during insertion, which may be addressed by regular awareness campaigns in colleges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.