Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41969647›Full record

ArticlemicroLife2026

Fragile research systems, brain drain, and predatory publishing in under-resourced countries.

Stipan Jonjić, Zeynep Ceren Karahan, Puri Lopez-Garcia, Paul Williams, Ani Gerbin, Luka Traven, Kenneth N Timmis, Paul B Rainey

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in microLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stipan JonjićCenter for Proteomics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka 51000, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5003-3108
Zeynep Ceren KarahanDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Ibn-i Sina Hospital Central Microbiology Laboratory, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara 06230, Turkey.
Puri Lopez-GarciaEcologie Societe Evolution, CNRS, Universite Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, Gif-sur-Yvette 91190, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0927-0651
Paul WilliamsBiodiscovery Institute and School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG72RD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1920-5036
Ani GerbinCenter for Proteomics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka 51000, Croatia.
Luka TravenDepartment of Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, 51000, Croatia.
Kenneth N TimmisInstitute of Microbiology, Technical University Braunschweig, Braunschweig 38106, Germany.
Paul B RaineyDepartment of Microbial Population Biology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plon 24306, Germany & Laboratory of Biophysics and Evolution, CBI, ESPCI, Paris, Universite PSL, CNRS, Paris 75005, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0879-5795

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many countries with lower research & innovation capacity face persistent constraints in building stable research systems. Chronic underfunding and weak science policy reduce institutional capacity and limit researchers' career prospects. These conditions encourage brain drain, particularly among early-career scientists who seek predictable funding, transparent evaluation, and merit-based advancement. As a result, research institutions lose skilled personnel, which weakens scientific training, governance, and research output. Additionally, within this environment, predatory publishing practices create further damage. These scientific outlets reward volume over quality, thus distorting evaluation criteria. They promote negative selection by favouring speed of publication at the expense of rigorous peer review. Over time, this weakens academic standards and undermines trust in the research output. The result is a decline in scientific credibility and an overall reduction in international competitiveness. Although predatory publishing is motivated by financial gain, it results in serious institutional consequences. It directly reshapes hiring, promotion, and funding decisions in ways that disadvantage high-quality research. This contributes to the erosion of both research integrity and academic communities.

Indexed as

brain-drainEU widening countriesfragile research systemspredatory publishing practiceresearch culture

Identifiers

PMID41969647
PMCPMC13069680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.