Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41969624›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2026

E-health intervention in pregnant women exposed to intimate partner violence (eIPV): Results of a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Antonella Ludmila Zapata-Calvente, Aurora Bueno Cavanillas, Karen Andreasen, Ditte Søndergaard Linde, Vibeke Rasch, Khalid S Khan, Stella Martín-de-Las-Heras

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04978064 (E-health Psychological Intervention in Pregnant Women Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04978064 nacompletednot on this map

E-health Psychological Intervention in Pregnant Women Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence (eIPV): a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de GranadaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled24ConditionsPregnancy Related, Violence, Gender-Based, Intimate Partner ViolenceArmse-health psychological counselling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Antonella Ludmila Zapata-CalventeBrain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Spain.
Aurora Bueno CavanillasDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Spain. CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Spain.
Karen AndreasenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Ditte Søndergaard LindeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Vibeke RaschDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Khalid S KhanDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Spain. CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Spain.
Stella Martín-de-Las-HerasDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University of Malaga, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility of randomising a sufficiently large number of pregnant women who screen positive for intimate partner violence (IPV) to perform a full-scale effectiveness trial. Methods: This pilot randomised trial was nested within a cohort of IPV-positive pregnant women who accepted an e-health package in Spain and Denmark. This study was co-designed with patient input using a modified Zelen's design and a qualitative evaluation. Eligible women were randomised to an intervention (received the e-health package) or to a control (received it with a delay). The primary outcome was the proportion of women screened positive for IPV who consented to be randomised to receive an e-health package with a delay. Results: Twenty-nine of the 51 women in the cohort were randomised. Of these, 12 were allocated to the control group, and 7 (58.3%) consented to receive the e-health package with a delay, i.e., 24.1% of the total randomised and 13.7% of the total cohort. The proportion of randomized women who adhered to treatment was 31.03% (9/29). Complete outcome data were obtained in 7/17 (41.17%) and 2/12 (16.66%) women in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Qualitative interviews indicated that the women perceived the intervention as beneficial and that delaying it was not acceptable. Conclusions: This pilot randomised trial indicated that a future full-scale randomised study would likely be unfeasible based on our Trial registration: NCT04978064. E-health Psychological Intervention in Pregnant Women Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence (eIPV). Registered 15 July 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04978064.

Indexed as

e-healthIntimate partner violencePregnancyPsychological interventionRandomised control trialTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41969624
PMCPMC13062527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.