ArticleHuman mutation2026
Engineering of the Melanoma Inhibitor of Apoptosis (ML-IAP) Anticancer Peptide Through Comprehensive In Silico Approaches.
Article in Human mutation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Melanoma represents the most malignant type of skin cancer. It is estimated that approximately 100,000 new cases of melanoma were diagnosed in 2022, resulting in over 7600 deaths in the United States alone. Recently, anticancer peptides (ACPs) have emerged as novel therapeutic agents for cancer, offering higher potency, biocompatibility, and fewer adverse reactions in host cells. One of the druggable targets of melanoma is the melanoma inhibitor of apoptosis (ML-IAP), conventionally inhibited by the nonapeptide AVPIAQKSE. The current study is aimed at enhancing both the binding affinity and safety profile of this peptide through in silico peptide engineering. Methods: Initially, the 3D structure of the protein was downloaded from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) (ID: 1OXQ) and prepared. The hotspot residues at the interface were detected using Discovery Studio Client 2021. Afterwards, saturation mutagenesis was conducted to discover the best potential amino acid substitutions with a positive impact on the binding affinity. The lead candidates were docked to the receptor via HPEPDOCK 2. Additionally, the safety profile was assessed using the ToxIBTL and AllerCatPro 2 servers. Finally, molecular dynamics simulations and principal component analysis were performed to check the stability of the best complexes. Results: HVPIAQKSE, WVPWAQKSE, and HVPWAQKSE were the best mutants that could be superior to the original peptide in terms of binding affinity as well as safety profile. MD results confirmed the stability, flexibility, reduced local motions, conformational changes, and more compact structure upon binding the receptor for 200 ns, which deserve in vitro validation as a better melanoma ACP therapeutic option. Conclusion: These variants displayed increased flexibility, reduced conformational alterations and local motions, and a more compact configuration, suggesting greater stability compared with the reference peptide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.