Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41969567›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2026

Negative partisanship, positive partisanship, and variation in climate policy attitudes on the political right.

Emily Huddart, Tony Silva, Parker Muzzerall, James N Druckman

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Affective Climate and Political Polarization: Identity, Ideology, and Support for Climate Policy.Canadian review of sociology = Revue canadienne de sociologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Paranormal Beliefs in Canada.Canadian review of sociology = Revue canadienne de sociologie · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily HuddartDepartment of Sociology, University of British Columbia, 6303 NW Marine Dr, Vancouver, BC, Canada V7T1Z1.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6723-4210
Tony SilvaDepartment of Sociology, University of British Columbia, 6303 NW Marine Dr, Vancouver, BC, Canada V7T1Z1.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0701-8169
Parker MuzzerallDepartment of Sociology, University of British Columbia, 6303 NW Marine Dr, Vancouver, BC, Canada V7T1Z1.
James N DruckmanDepartment of Political Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1249-6790

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservatives are more likely than liberals to oppose climate policies, resulting in political polarization over climate change. Most research treats this gap as if it reflects two cohesive blocs on opposite sides of an issue. Drawing on original survey data from a probability sample of Canadians (

Indexed as

political polarization, climate policy, affective polarization

Identifiers

PMID41969567
PMCPMC13069899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.