ReviewTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2026
Artificial intelligence-based prediction of esophageal adenocarcinoma risk in Barrett's esophagus patients: a literature review.
Review in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the principal precursor lesion for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), a malignancy with rising incidence and poor survival when diagnosed at advanced stages. Current screening and surveillance strategies rely on endoscopy and random biopsies, which are invasive, resource-intensive, and prone to sampling error. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool to enhance early detection, risk stratification, and surveillance efficiency in BE. This narrative review summarizes contemporary AI applications in BE management, evaluates their diagnostic and predictive performance, and discusses barriers to clinical adoption. Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane. ClinicalTrials.gov and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) were checked for ongoing trials and Good Scholar was used for citation chasing to identify peer-reviewed studies up to June 2025. Eligible studies evaluated AI-based approaches for BE screening, dysplasia detection, risk prediction, or surveillance optimization using vision-based or non-vision-based models. Key Content and Findings: Vision-aided AI systems, particularly convolutional neural networks applied to high-definition white-light endoscopy and image-enhanced endoscopy, demonstrate sensitivities approaching 90% for dysplasia and early EAC detection. Non-vision-based models leveraging electronic health records, biomarkers, and histopathology achieve area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values up to 0.84 for predicting BE or EAC risk. Multimodal approaches integrating clinical, endoscopic, and molecular data show promise for personalized surveillance strategies. However, challenges remain, including limited external validation, algorithm transparency, data bias, workflow integration, and cost considerations. Conclusions: AI has the potential to transform BE care by improving early detection and enabling risk-adapted surveillance. Multicenter validation, explainable models, and cost-effectiveness analyses are essential before widespread clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.