ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Peripheral blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells in osteochondral repair: a perspective on emerging insights and future directions.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) isolated from peripheral blood (PB) are gaining increasing attention among both researchers and clinicians, representing a promising alternative to traditional stem cell sources such as bone marrow and adipose tissue. Their therapeutic use offers key advantages like high accessibility, minimally invasive collection and autologous nature of the graft. Together with the ability to differentiate into multiple cell types, PB-MSC features make them ideal candidates for a wide range of clinical applications in the fields of regenerative medicine, tissue engineering and immunotherapy. While the therapeutic potential of PB-derived MSCs is more and more acknowledged, several challenges still need to be overcome regarding, for example, their isolation, expansion, and differentiation efficiency. For clinical translation, PB-MSC administration may be specifically indicated when minimally invasive autologous cell therapies are required, especially when bone marrow harvest is not recommended due to age, comorbidity, or prior surgeries. Conversely, PB-MSC auto-transplant should be avoided in patients suffering from hematological malignancies, active infections, or bone marrow disorders, where circulating stem cell populations may be altered, or their isolation poses safety risks. In this Perspective, we highlight recent advances in PB-MSC isolation and characterization, discuss their bioengineering integration into osteochondral repair strategies, and examine their immunomodulatory potential in osteoarthritis (OA). We propose that PB-MSCs integrate regenerative and immunomodulatory properties, positioning them as a promising, autologous cell source for next-generation personalized regenerative therapies. However, their clinical translation critically depends on the development of reproducible, GMP-compliant expansion protocols and validated potency assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.