ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
DNA methylation-based deconvolution study of glioblastoma heterogeneity and identification of cell compositions associated with patient survival.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive, heterogeneous brain tumor with limited treatment options. This study employs DNA methylation-based deconvolution of GBM to define its cellular composition and its association with patient outcomes. Methods: We generated oligodendroglial precursor cells at various developmental stages from enriched human neural progenitor cultures and used their DNA methylation signatures, along with published signatures of brain tumor cell types and the tumor microenvironment, to deconvolve 263 adult GBMs (Heidelberg cohort). An independent cohort of 199 GBMs from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and GEO, all treated with standard-of-care therapy, was similarly deconvolved. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess the prognostic value of the neoplastic components. Results: GBM deconvolution uncovered distinct cellular compositions that differed between the neoplastic and non-neoplastic component. The neoplastic fractions averaged 70% of the tumor bulk and were predominantly composed of oligodendrocyte-like (43%) cell populations, in addition to oligodendrocyte precursor-like (27%), astrocyte-like (19%), and mesenchymal stem cell-like (11%) populations. The non-neoplastic fractions were enriched for macrophages, vascular cells, and immune cell populations. A higher oligodendrocyte-like signature was linked to poorer survival (median survival 14.3 vs. 15.3 months; Conclusions: The methylation-based deconvolution data and analyses provided insight into GBM heterogeneity and highlighted the prognostic potential of the astrocyte-to-oligodendrocyte ratio and its application in personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.