ReviewJournal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2026
The Concept of Autism in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder: Historical Divergence and Phenomenological Rapprochement.
Review in Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring Both In-Depth Theories of Disorders and the Current State of Child and Adolescent Mental Health at the Same Time.Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to trace the historical origins and conceptual divergence of "autism" as employed in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD), and to examine their recent rapprochement through the lens of phenomenological psychopathology. A narrative review was conducted to analyze primary historical sources, including works by Bleuler, Kanner, and their predecessors, along with contemporary literature on neurodevelopmental perspectives, social cognition, and phenomenological psychopathology. The analysis focused on comparing the structures of self-experience between patients with ASD and those with SSD using frameworks such as ipseity disturbance and anomalous self-experience. Bleuler's "Autismus" (1911) denoted active withdrawal from reality and construction of an inner fantasy world in schizophrenia, whereas Kanner's "infantile autism" (1943) described innate deficits in forming affective bonds. Despite strict diagnostic separation since DSM-III, recent research reveals shared genetic pathways, social cognitive impairments, and clinical presentations. Phenomenological analysis revealed that while both conditions share common predicaments in being-in-the-world, they manifest qualitatively distinct patterns of self-disorder. Patients with SSD exhibit ipseity disturbance characterized by instability of the minimal self, diminished self-affection, and hyperreflexivity, whereas patients with ASD generally show preserved minimal self but deficient intersubjective attunement. Social withdrawal in SSD represents a defensive retreat against ontological anxiety and self-dissolution, whereas in ASD it reflects involuntary isolation arising from impaired intuitive connections with others. ASD and SSD share common predicaments in being-in-the-world, yet manifest qualitatively distinct forms of self-disorder. This phenomenological framework offers a promising transdiagnostic approach for clarifying the relationship between these two conditions and understanding the essence of "autism."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.