Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41969355›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2025

Combined predictive model for prostate cancer screening: Development and validation study.

Yu Li, Fang Yang, Xuebin Liu, Jiping Luo, Siyu Dan, Xiuli He, Guihao Hu, Ling He, Xiachuan Qin, Tao Wu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yu LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Anzhen Hospital of Capital Medical University Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nan Chong, Sichuan 637000, China.
Fang YangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of JiNan University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong 510000, China.
Xuebin LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Anzhen Hospital of Capital Medical University Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nan Chong, Sichuan 637000, China.
Jiping LuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, No.1 South Maoyuan Road, Shunqing District, Nanchong City, Sichuan 637000, China.
Siyu DanDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, No.1 South Maoyuan Road, Shunqing District, Nanchong City, Sichuan 637000, China.
Xiuli HeDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, No.1 South Maoyuan Road, Shunqing District, Nanchong City, Sichuan 637000, China.
Guihao HuSichuan Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, China.
Ling HeSichuan Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, China.
Xiachuan QinDepartment of Ultrasound, ChengDu Second People's Hospital, ChengDu City, Sichuan 610000, China.
Tao WuDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, No.1 South Maoyuan Road, Shunqing District, Nanchong City, Sichuan 637000, China.
Wensheng YueDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, No.1 South Maoyuan Road, Shunqing District, Nanchong City, Sichuan 637000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early detection of prostate cancer (PCa) remains challenging, as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and digital rectal examination (DRE) offer limited specificity. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is routinely used for biopsy guidance, but its diagnostic potential for PCa screening is underexplored. We aimed to evaluate TRUS-derived morphological features and develop a nomogram that integrates clinical and TRUS characteristics to improve PCa risk stratification. Methods: Consecutive patients with suspected PCa were enrolled from two tertiary centers (training cohort: n = 154, October 2021-January 2023; validation cohort: n = 51, December 2021-June 2022). Demographic data, laboratory-derived PSA indices (including PSA density), and TRUS parameters (independently assessed by two blinded sonographers) were collected and analyzed. A predictive nomogram was constructed using multivariate logistic regression and externally validated. Results: In the training cohort (mean age 70.9 ± 8.0 years; 72 PCa, 82 benign), independent predictors of PCa included elevated PSA density (OR=3.86, 95 % CI: 1.30-11.40, Conclusion: TRUS-derived features (ill-defined zones, hyper-enhancement) significantly enhance PCa detection when combined with clinical parameters. Our nomogram provides a practical, visual tool to guide biopsy decisions and demonstrates robust performance across cohorts.

Indexed as

Digital rectal examinationNomogramProstate cancerProstate-specific antigenScreeningTransrectal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID41969355
PMCPMC13064168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.