ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
An analysis of anxiety and depression in second-trimester pregnant women with cervical insufficiency.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Perinatal mood disorders can seriously endanger the health of pregnant women and fetuses, thus causing heavy burdens and potential hazards to families and society. This study aimed to investigate anxiety and depression in second-trimester pregnant women with cervical insufficiency and provide guidance for clinical practice. Methods: A total of 136 second trimester women with cervical insufficiency who underwent laparoscopic cervical cerclage were selected as the observation group, and 117 Pregnant women with no pregnancy complications diagnosed in the second trimester of pregnancy composed the control group. In addition, both online and paper questionnaires were designed to collect basic information. Moreover, Zung's Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Self-Rating Depression Scale were employed to evaluate the anxiety and depression of participants in both groups. Results: Pregnant women in the cervical insufficiency group had significantly higher Self-rating Anxiety Scale and Self-rating Depression Scale scores than did those in the control group (both P<0.001). Compared with those in the control group, a greater percentage of pregnant women in the cervical insufficiency group met the diagnostic criteria for anxiety and depression. The multivariate linear regression model revealed that cervical insufficiency and a history of abnormal pregnancy were related to higher Self-rating Anxiety Scale scores, whereas a history of abnormal pregnancy was also associated with higher Self-rating Depression Scale scores (both P<0.05). Conclusion: Pregnant women with cervical insufficiency are more likely to suffer from anxiety and depression in the second trimester than normal pregnant women are. Healthcare professionals should pay more attention to these patients in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.