ReviewCurrent urology2026
Neurobiology of urological diseases.
Review in Current urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowledge obtained mainly in the last 2 decades has provided a better understanding of the mechanisms and pathways through which the nervous system regulates the function of tissues and organs whose diseases fall under the care of urologists. It has been demonstrated that the nervous system is involved not only in the maintenance of homeostasis in urological organs but also in the reparative and regenerative processes that take place in them. In addition, the nervous system is involved in the activation of compensatory and adaptive mechanisms in response to pathological processes occurring in these organs, but it may also potentiate the progression of urological diseases. Investigation of the mechanisms and pathways through which the nervous system exerts these influences was historically the domain of neuro-urology. Since it is now clear that the nervous system exerts more complex influences on urological organs, and that these organs in turn influence the functions of the nervous system, the term neurobiology of urological diseases is more appropriate for this area of research, which lies at the intersection of urology and neuroscience. The aim of this review is to introduce the concept of the neurobiology of urological diseases and to describe its implications in urology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.