ReviewAPL bioengineering2026
Research progress in flap temperature monitoring technologies and applications after transplantation.
Review in APL bioengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a primary method for tissue repair and functional reconstruction, flap transplantation has achieved a clinical success rate of over 90%. However, the postoperative incidence of vascular crisis remains as high as 10%-30%, making it a leading cause of reoperation and disability. Flap temperature is a key indicator closely correlated with microcirculatory status, making its monitoring essential for the early detection of complications. This paper provides a systematic review of the physiological mechanisms underlying postoperative flap temperature, the characteristic temperature changes associated with venous and arterial crises, and the latest advancements in monitoring technologies. It comprehensively analyzes the principles, advantages, and limitations of various methods, including manual palpation, contact thermometry, infrared thermography, fiber optic sensing, and microwave thermometry. Furthermore, the review explores the application of intelligent technologies such as wearable sensors, artificial intelligence-driven predictive systems, implantable flexible devices, and multimodal fusion monitoring. Current challenges, including poor real-time performance, low precision, and a lack of standardization, are highlighted. Future development is directed toward precision, intelligence, and integration, with an emphasis on multidisciplinary collaboration to create more accurate, convenient, and intelligent monitoring systems. These advancements aim to achieve precise early warning and timely intervention, ultimately improving flap survival rates and patient outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.