ArticleHealth policy OPEN2026
Policy barriers to drug repurposing in Europe: different stakeholder perspectives identified during survey-based shortlisting of key challenges.
Article in Health policy OPEN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Finding new therapeutic indications for established medicines continues to have important impact. Although drug repurposing (DR) offers the potential for a faster and more affordable complement to Objective: To prioritize barriers identified earlier in a systematic literature review by the REMEDi4ALL Horizon Europe project, involving multiple stakeholder groups, to create a shortlist of the most important barriers and to examine differences in stakeholders' perceptions. Methods: A policy survey was conducted among stakeholder groups involved in DR. Participants rated the barriers based on their impact and actionability, using 5-point categorical scales. A weighted scoring method was used to create the shortlist by combining scores across domains, while ensuring that each stakeholder group's preferences were retained in the final shortlist. Results: 60 individual responses were collected. The final shortlist contained 22 barriers, including 4 barriers related to exclusivity rights for repurposed medicines (RMs), 2 to pricing of RMs, 5 to market authorization of RMs, 2 to perception off-patent RMs, 2 to business case for off-patent RMs, 2 to non-industry funded DR, 2 to health technology assessment of RMs, 2 to ecosystem for non-profit or small-medium sized enterprises-driven DR, and 1 to business case for repurposing on-patent compounds. Conclusion: Prioritizing barriers helps identify solutions by addressing the critical challenges first. Acknowledging that different stakeholder groups may perceive the impact and actionability of these barriers differently is crucial for building a shared, multi-stakeholder perspective when formulating policy recommendations to address the barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.