Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41969272›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

Integrating Radiomics and Computational Pathology to Predict Early Recurrence of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Uncover Its Biological Basis in Tumor Microenvironment.

Sihang Cheng, Fuze Cong, Shenbo Zhang, Rui Lv, Wenjia Zhang, Xinyi Ke, Juncheng Wu, Zhonghe Zhao, Kui Zhao, Di Dong and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Sihang ChengDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6952-2064
Fuze CongDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Shenbo ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Rui LvDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Wenjia ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xinyi KeDepartment of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Juncheng WuDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhonghe ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Kui ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Di DongSchool of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ruofan ZhangSchool of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhengyu JinDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Max SeidenstickerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Zhiwei WangDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Huanwen WuDepartment of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xianlin HanDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Nan HongDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Huadan XueDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation 7232116Beijing Natural Science Foundation 7244524Beijing Natural Science Foundation L242061Beijing Natural Science Foundation L252174CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences 2024-I2M-ZD-001National High-Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2025-PUMCH-D-002National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFA0915304National Natural Science Foundation of China 22232006National Natural Science Foundation of China 82202268National Natural Science Foundation of China 82471950National Natural Science Foundation of China 82502418Peking Union Medical College Hospital Talent Cultivation Program UHB11857Peking University Clinical Scientist Training Program BMU2025PYJH043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate prediction of early recurrence (ER) after radical resection remains a critical challenge in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aimed to develop and validate an integrated radiomic-pathology (Rad-Path) model for ER prediction and to elucidate its underlying biological mechanisms.

methodsA retrospective cohort of 225 PDAC patients who underwent R0 resection was included. Preoperative CT images and whole-slide images (WSI) were collected for the extraction of radiomic features and computational pathology features. Selected features were used to develop 11 distinct machine learning models. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm was employed to evaluate feature importance. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and spatial transcriptomics (ST) were performed on prospectively collected specimens.

resultsThe final Rad-Path model achieved AUCs of 0.851 and 0.814 in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively. The predicted ER group was specifically linked to the enrichment of fibroblasts and pancreatic stellate cells, as well as dysregulation in extracellular matrix (ECM)-related pathways. This finding was validated histopathologically, as predicted ER patients predominantly displayed a "reactive-dominant" phenotype marked by abundant activated fibroblasts and ECM deposition.

conclusionOur study offers a high-performance predictive model for ER in PDAC and establishes ECM remodeling as a key biological mechanism underlying the predictions.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPancreatic NeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiomicsRetrospective Studiescomputational pathologyearly recurrenceextracellular matrix remodelingpancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaradiomics

Identifiers

PMID41969272
PMCPMC13252617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.