ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2026
[Assessment on data processing methods for nontarget identification of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances using liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry].
Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The widespread use, persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have raised global concern. The number of PFAS types continues to grow, driven by changing industrial demands and regulatory environments. Non-target analysis using high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) is an effective methodology for identifying novel and unknown PFAS in environmental matrices. The efficacy of non-target analysis is critically influenced by the data acquisition mode, peak picking algorithm, and deconvolution strategy. Using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with an Orbitrap mass spectrometer (UHPLC-Orbitrap MS), this study aims to systematically evaluate data processing methods for non-targeted PFAS identification under data-dependent acquisition (DDA) and data-independent acquisition (DIA) modes. A clean sludge sample was spiked with 34 PFAS standards at three levels to assess method performance, alongside the analysis of three electroplating sludge samples. To compare the identification performance between DDA and DIA modes, a multi-step evaluation process was employed. Firstly, we assessed the peak picking capabilities of two widely used data processing software packages, MS-DIAL and MZmine. The key parameters for peak picking process are MS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.