ArticleBJPsych open2026
Exploring career concerns and opportunities for UK-based early career researchers working in the field of eating disorders: Delphi study.
Article in BJPsych open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough there may be common challenges and opportunities for early career researchers (ECRs), those working in the field of eating disorders may face unique barriers and require tailored support.
aimsThe current study sought to explore consensus on career concerns and opportunities in eating disorder ECRs.
methodA three-stage Delphi model was conducted. Round 1 involved participants rating career concern and opportunity statements, with free-text responses. Researchers then generated a list of Delphi statements, which were shared in round 2, and participants were asked to indicate their level of agreement. A final round was shared, with median ratings from round 2 and the option to change or further expand on responses. Final consensus was calculated as percentage agreement.
resultsCareer concerns reaching consensus included timeline pressures, personal sacrifices for roles, unclear career trajectories, job insecurity, funding concerns, fears of being pushed out of the field and pressures to publish. There was no consensus on a range of other concerns (work/life balance, isolation, mental health and well-being and power imbalances), suggestive of context-dependent experiences. Participants agreed that almost all the presented career opportunities were of importance to eating disorder ECRs.
conclusionsFindings suggest that eating disorder ECRs face significant barriers toward remaining in the field. Although many concerns reflect broader ECR experience (limited research funding, associated job insecurity), some appear to be particularly exacerbated for ECRs working in the eating disorder field. Further research is needed to inform directions for tailored support strategies, such as peer support, mentoring schemes and increased funding from governing bodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.