ReviewThe Journal of experimental biology2026
Mechanical control: parallel pathways for modulating movement.
Review in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animals across diverse taxa navigate complex and unpredictable environments by modulating movement to maintain stability and efficiency. Active neural feedback has traditionally been viewed as the sole and primary mechanism for control. In this Review, we highlight the importance of non-neural, mechanical control mechanisms that allow for rapid modulation of locomotor systems. As the speed of movement increases or organisms face perturbations that rapidly change loading conditions, neural responsiveness may become too slow to adapt effectively. In such cases, pre-tuned modulation through intrinsic muscle properties, elastic structures and tissue compliance can provide a faster, more reliable response, sometimes outperforming active control in maintaining stability and energetic efficiency. We explore how these forms of mechanical control complement neural feedback and enhance control across size scales, particularly in systems where rapid adjustments are critical. We synthesize recent findings to provide a framework for understanding the trade-offs between passive and active control and highlight the potential mechanisms that function in parallel, across levels of biological organization to modulate locomotor output.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.