Observational studyJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2026
Ultrasound-Guided Transperineal Versus Transrectal Prostate Aspiration Biopsy in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer: An Observational Comparison Study.
Observational study in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUltrasound-guided prostate biopsy is the standard method for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, the effect of the optimal puncture approach on diagnostic yield and patient outcomes remains controversial.
objectiveTo compare the diagnostic effectiveness and clinical outcomes of ultrasound-guided transperineal versus transrectal prostate aspiration biopsy in patients suspected of prostate cancer.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 150 patients who underwent prostate biopsy at our hospital between February 2020 and August 2024. Patients were divided into transperineal (n = 62) and transrectal (n = 88) groups. Key outcomes including cancer detection rate, complications, pain (VAS), and negative emotions were compared, with p < .05 indicating a statistically significant difference.
resultsNo significant difference was found between the transperineal and transrectal groups in the detection rates of prostate cancer (51.61% versus 43.18%), chronic prostatitis (12.90% versus 18.18%), or benign prostatic hyperplasia (35.48% versus 38.64%). Transperineal biopsy required longer puncture time (22.92 ± 2.02 min versus 19.70 ± 1.93 min), but resulted in fewer overall complications (20.97% versus 38.64%), lower post-procedure pain scores (VAS: 2.82 ± 1.13 versus 3.68 ± 1.14), and lower anxiety (HAMA: 10.34 ± 1.29 versus 12.55 ± 1.44) and depression scores (HAMD: 10.33 ± 1.68 versus 12.90 ± 1.38).
conclusionBoth ultrasound-guided transperineal and transrectal prostate biopsies are effective diagnostic methods for prostate cancer. Transperineal biopsy offers advantages in reducing postoperative complications, pain, and negative emotional responses, supporting its preferential use in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.