Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41968934›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2026

Community-based interventions addressing open defecation in Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.

Ami Makita, Natalia Calanzani

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ami MakitaInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0009-0002-9536-8766
Natalia CalanzaniInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5068-2543

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open defecation (OD) remains a major public health issue, particularly in rural Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where a significant proportion of the population still lacks access to basic sanitation. It increases the risk of infectious diseases, psychosocial stress, and sexual violence, especially for women. Community-based interventions, such as Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS), have been implemented to eliminate OD through behaviour change. This scoping review aimed to map community-based approaches used to eliminate OD in SSA. It followed Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Peer-reviewed primary studies published since 2010 on community-based interventions addressing OD in SSA were included. Nationwide or poorly described interventions were excluded. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted, and synthesised data. Fifteen studies on community-based interventions were included. Most (

Indexed as

DefecationSanitationToilet FacilitiesAfrica South of the SaharaHumansSub-Saharan African PeopleCLTScommunity-based interventionsCommunity-Led Total SanitationOpen defecationWASH

Identifiers

PMID41968934
PMCPMC13072696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.