Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41968891›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of biological anthropology2026

Size Disparity in Putative Primate Adaptive Radiations and Other Mammalian Clades.

Jeremiah E Scott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of biological anthropology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jeremiah E ScottDepartment of Medical Anatomical Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1427-3010

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdaptive radiation is commonly viewed as the rapid production of phenotypic disparity and taxonomic diversity. Among primates, two clades have been identified as potential adaptive radiations: the lemurs of Madagascar and the platyrrhines of the Americas. This study examines these clades for one of the proposed signals of adaptive radiation: exceptional disparity in an ecologically important trait. MATERIALS AND

methodsI sliced a time-scaled molecular phylogeny of extant and recently extinct mammals at the Eocene-Oligocene and mid-Oligocene boundaries, creating samples of clades that are comparable in age to or younger than Lemuriformes and Platyrrhini. For each clade, phenotypic disparity was quantified as the variance of species means for body mass. Differences in disparity attributable to clade age were controlled using phylogenetic regression.

resultsBoth primate clades have high age-adjusted disparity: lemuriforms are among the most size-disparate, ranking in the 95th percentile among clades originating after the Eocene-Oligocene boundary; platyrrhines are in the 84th percentile for clades originating after the mid-Oligocene boundary. None of the high-disparity clades in the samples are outliers, and the distributions of disparity are neither positively skewed nor bimodal.

conclusionsIf adaptive radiation has influenced size evolution in mammals, the effect is not apparent in the distributions of size disparity. Without outliers, positive skew, or bimodality, there are no criteria for identifying exceptional clades. The magnitudes of disparity found in lemuriforms and platyrrhines can be interpreted as consistent with adaptive radiation, but size disparity does not provide decisive support for recognizing them as such.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBody SizePlatyrrhiniPrimatesAnimalsAnthropology, PhysicalFossilsMadagascarPhylogenyecological opportunityLemuriformesmacroevolutionPlatyrrhini

Identifiers

PMID41968891
PMCPMC13071472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.