Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41968869›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026

Aversive memory and extinction learning for noxious stimuli and aversive tastants in bumblebees.

Sajedeh Sarlak, Ahmad Ashouri, Seyed Hossein Goldansaz, HaDi MaBouDi, Christoph Kleineidam, Lars Chittka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sajedeh SarlakDepartment of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj 77871-31587, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9446-0424
Ahmad AshouriDepartment of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj 77871-31587, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-5508-4964
Seyed Hossein GoldansazDepartment of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj 77871-31587, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-7574-7553
HaDi MaBouDiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7612-6465
Christoph KleineidamNeurobiology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, 78464 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0671-1455
Lars ChittkaSchool of Biological and Behavioral Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8153-1732

Funding

Coefficient Giving/Good Ventures FoundationDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 422037984Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/P006094/1Good Ventures FoundationIranian National Science Foundation 97011974University of Tehran
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid learning of aversive stimuli is adaptive, but the persistence of the avoidance response in the absence of further reinforcement might depend on the severity of the adverse experience. For example, an experience involving injury would be expected to lead to more durable memory than the mere exposure to an unpleasant tastant, especially when new experiences indicate that the aversive stimulus is no longer present. We investigated how bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) learn and retain associations between flower colours and two types of aversive stimuli: electric shock and saturated salt (NaCl) solution. Using a conditioning paradigm, we examined how these stimuli influence avoidance learning across foraging bouts and tracked the process of extinction learning, the formation of new memory in response to the absence of the reinforcement, over two weeks. Our results show that bees rapidly learn to avoid both stimuli, and reach >90% accuracy of avoidance after six foraging bouts. We then examined how bees modified their avoidance behaviour in the absence of further aversive stimulation. Testing extinction learning on days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14, we found that electric shock as a nociceptive stimulus induces a more persistent avoidance response, whereas exposure to the salt by engaging gustatory aversion pathways leads to a three times faster extinction rate. This suggests that although the initial training leads to equal levels of avoidance for both stimuli, bumblebees might display greater behavioural flexibility when updating the association between a colour and an unpleasant taste in comparison to a potentially injurious stimulus.

Indexed as

Avoidance LearningExtinction, PsychologicalMemoryAnimalsBeesElectroshockTasteAversive learningBombus terrestrisCognitive flexibilityDecision-makingGustatory aversionNociceptive aversion

Identifiers

PMID41968869
PMCPMC13245911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.