ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026
Aversive memory and extinction learning for noxious stimuli and aversive tastants in bumblebees.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid learning of aversive stimuli is adaptive, but the persistence of the avoidance response in the absence of further reinforcement might depend on the severity of the adverse experience. For example, an experience involving injury would be expected to lead to more durable memory than the mere exposure to an unpleasant tastant, especially when new experiences indicate that the aversive stimulus is no longer present. We investigated how bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) learn and retain associations between flower colours and two types of aversive stimuli: electric shock and saturated salt (NaCl) solution. Using a conditioning paradigm, we examined how these stimuli influence avoidance learning across foraging bouts and tracked the process of extinction learning, the formation of new memory in response to the absence of the reinforcement, over two weeks. Our results show that bees rapidly learn to avoid both stimuli, and reach >90% accuracy of avoidance after six foraging bouts. We then examined how bees modified their avoidance behaviour in the absence of further aversive stimulation. Testing extinction learning on days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14, we found that electric shock as a nociceptive stimulus induces a more persistent avoidance response, whereas exposure to the salt by engaging gustatory aversion pathways leads to a three times faster extinction rate. This suggests that although the initial training leads to equal levels of avoidance for both stimuli, bumblebees might display greater behavioural flexibility when updating the association between a colour and an unpleasant taste in comparison to a potentially injurious stimulus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.