ArticleBehavioural neurology2026
Assessing Executive Function in Patients With Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Through a Game-Based Assessment Task.
Article in Behavioural neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing Executive Function in Patients With Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Through a Game-Based Assessment Task.Behavioural neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTemporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is often accompanied by executive function (EF) impairment, highlighting the need for accessible and quantitative assessment approaches. In this study, we applied our previously developed game-based executive function assessment tool (EFAT) to evaluate EF performance in TLE patients.
methodsThirty-two TLE patients and 29 healthy controls (HCs) completed a comprehensive battery of standardized tests, including the Stroop Color-Word Test (SCWT) and the Trail Making Test (TMT), as well as the EFAT. Metrics from the EFAT (number of touches, number of correct guesses, accuracy, and learning latency) were selected and analyzed.
resultsCompared with HCs, TLE patients showed significant EF deficits, including longer completion times on TMT-A (t(59) = 4.42, p < 0.001) and TMT-B (t(59) = 3.50, p = 0.001), as well as poorer SCWT-1 performance (t(59) = 2.22, p = 0.036). In the EFAT, TLE patients exhibited more touches (t(59) = -2.75, p = 0.008), fewer correct guesses (t(59) = -3.74, p < 0.001), and lower accuracy (t(59) = -2.65, p = 0.010). Game-derived metrics were significantly correlated with TMT scores.
conclusionsEFAT detected executive deficits in TLE patients across social and nonsocial conditions and offered an objective, engaging complementary tool for EF assessment. These findings support its preliminary clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.