ArticleJournal of periodontal & implant science2026
A machine learning model for periodontitis based on integrative gene expression analysis: validation in an independent patient cohort.
Article in Journal of periodontal & implant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a gene expression-based prediction model for periodontitis by identifying a compact set of predictive genes and to validate the model using an independent cohort of patient samples analyzed by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).
methodsUsing a total of 9 Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) series, we first performed feature selection through differential expression analysis and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values in 2 GEO series (GSE10334 and GSE16134). The remaining datasets were then integrated to construct an extended multi-cohort dataset (680 samples: 193 healthy and 487 with periodontitis) for model development using the XGBoost classifier. An exhaustive search with nested cross-validation (CV) was conducted to identify the optimal gene subset. Model performance was estimated using repeated 10-fold CV and summarized by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with corresponding standard deviations. Gene-level interpretation was performed using SHAP rankings and univariate analyses. Validation was conducted in a newly collected RT-qPCR patient cohort (n=20; 10 healthy individuals and 10 patients with periodontitis) derived from gingival tissue samples, using z-score-transformed ΔCt values without model retraining.
resultsThe optimal 4-gene model (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-4 [
conclusionsThe compact 4-gene XGBoost model provides reproducible and interpretable prediction of periodontitis across GEO datasets and demonstrates moderate performance in a newly collected RT-qPCR patient cohort, suggesting preliminary cross-platform feasibility. However, the wide confidence intervals underscore the need for larger prospective cohorts to confirm its clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.