ArticleJournal of periodontal & implant science2026
Effect of pseudo-periosteum on hard and soft tissue regeneration following lateral bone augmentation using a titanium mesh: an experimental
Article in Journal of periodontal & implant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe aims of this study were 1) to evaluate the 16-week bone augmentation outcomes using a titanium mesh (TM), including an 8-week transmucosal healing period following TM removal, and 2) to investigate the impact of pseudo-periosteum formation on regenerative outcomes.
methodsAtrophic alveolar ridge defects were induced in 6 canine mandibles, and 5 peri-implant defects were created in each hemi-mandible. Bone augmentation was attempted using the following randomly allocated modalities: 1) Control: no treatment; 2) TM group: blood clot covered by TM; 3) TM + bone substitute (BS) group: synthetic BS covered by TM; 4) TM + collagen membrane (CM) group: blood clot covered by TM and CM; and 5) TM + BS + CM group: BS covered by TM and CM. TMs were removed after 8 weeks, followed by abutment connection and an additional 8-week healing period. After sacrifice, histomorphometric analyses of hard and soft tissues were conducted.
resultsRegardless of early TM exposure (5/30), all implants achieved successful osseointegration and demonstrated comparable bone regeneration outcomes. No significant differences in horizontal or vertical bone gain were observed among the groups, whereas superiority of the TM + BS group over the control group showed a higher augmented bone percentage (
conclusionsTM removal after 8 weeks did not significantly affect the histologic outcomes of lateral bone augmentation performed with simultaneous implant placement. The presence of a pseudo-periosteum did not adversely influence either hard or soft tissue regenerative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.