Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41968588›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026

Crosstalk Between Auditory and Visual information in Motor Learning and Savings.

Olivier White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Olivier WhiteINSERM UMR1093-CAPS, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UFR des Sciences du Sport, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9119-1329

Funding

Conseil Général de BourgogneFonds Européen de Développement Régional (FEDER)Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensorimotor adaptation relies on the integration of multisensory feedback, yet the specific contributions of auditory signals to this process remain poorly understood compared to vision. We tested 46 participants on a reaching task using visual, auditory, or combined feedback about terminal errors. Participants alternated between feedback modalities during learning and relearning, revealing how adaptation transfers across sensory systems. Strikingly, although auditory feedback alone failed to support initial learning, prior visual learning enabled subsequent auditory adaptation. Further experiments showed that this cross-modal transfer stems from a memory of the learned reaching direction, acting as an attractor for movement, independent of error-based mechanisms, or explicit strategies. Our findings unveil a novel pathway for sensory integration in motor learning, with implications for designing cross-modal training protocols.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionFeedback, SensoryLearningPsychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultaction and decision makinginternal modelsmotor adaptationperceptionsavingsskill transfer

Identifiers

PMID41968588
PMCPMC13071209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.