ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026
Segmental copy number amplifications are more stable than aneuploidies in the absence of selection.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Collective posterior inference from highly variable empirical replicates.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Copy number variants (CNVs) are DNA duplications and deletions that cause genetic variation, underlying rapid adaptive evolution. CNVs often confer selective advantages but can also incur fitness costs. Evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in nutrient-limited chemostats recurrently selects for amplifications of nutrient transporter genes. However, their fate upon return to a non-selective environment remains unknown. To investigate CNV fitness and stability upon removing the original selection pressure, we studied 15 CNV lineages (11 segmental and 4 whole-chromosomal amplifications) selected in nitrogen-limited chemostats. CNV stability was monitored using fluorescent reporters during propagation in nutrient-rich batch cultures for 110 to 220 generations. All aneuploid lineages showed rapid CNV loss and reversion to a single-copy genotype, whereas segmental amplifications were remarkably stable; one of the 11 strains reverted. Pairwise fitness competitions in rich media revealed strong fitness defects associated solely with CNVs that reverted; reversion led to increased fitness. Using simulation-based inference to estimate reversion rates and fitness effects, we determined negative selection as the primary driver of CNV loss. Whole-genome sequencing revealed that reversion of aneuploids and a segmental amplification left no evidence of prior CNV existence, rendering revertant genomes indistinguishable from the single-copy ancestor. Detailed characterization of a partial revertant identified chromosomal translocation, suggesting that extant CNVs can undergo structural diversification. Our findings provide novel evidence that most segmental CNVs adapted to nitrogen limitation are stable upon removal of selection, but costly gene amplifications are readily reversible. Together, these highlight the importance of CNVs in both long-term genome evolution and rapid, reversible adaptation to transient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.