ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2026
Dimethyl Fumarate, But Not Rituximab, Reduces Serum GFAP Levels and PIRMA in Relapsing-Remitting MS.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSerum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) levels are believed to reflect mainly acute and chronic disease processes in multiple sclerosis (MS), respectively. In this study, we investigated whether dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and rituximab (RTX) differentially affect these biomarkers.
methodsRIFUND-MS was a 2-year, rater-blinded, 1:1 randomized controlled multicenter trial comparing DMF and RTX in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Serum samples for analysis of sNFL and sGFAP were collected at baseline and 0, 6, 12 and 24. Log-transformed biomarker data were analyzed with linear mixed models, based on intention to treat (ITT), per protocol (PP) and accounting for therapy switches. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to evaluate progression outcomes.
resultsOf 200 participants, 197 were analyzed. Based on ITT, sNfL decreased significantly in both arms from baseline to month 24; by 50.7% (CI 43.7%-56.8%; p < 0.001) with RTX, and by 46.4% (CI 38.6%-53.2%; p < 0.001) with DMF, no differences between treatments (global p-value: ITT = 0.06; PP = 0.08; switch group = 0.15). In contrast, sGFAP remained stable in RTX (3.6% decrease; CI -7.8%-13.8%, p = 0.81) but decreased with DMF (18.4%; CI 8.5%-27.2%; p < 0.001). Global analyses favored DMF (ITT = 0.02; PP = 0.004; switch group = 0.74). The risk of progression independent of relapse and MRI activity (PIRMA) was higher with RTX (HR 3.3, CI 1.1-10, p = 0.04).
interpretationBoth RTX and DMF reduced sNfL levels, consistent with suppression of acute inflammatory disease activity. However, only DMF was associated with a sustained reduction in sGFAP and a lower risk of non-inflammatory disability progression. These findings suggest that DMF may exert additional effects on astrocyte-related or compartmentalized CNS pathology beyond peripheral immune modulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.