Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41968537›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026

Neural and Behavioral Tracking of Musical Phrases Occurs Without Temporal Regularity.

Zofia Anna Hołubowska, Xiangbin Teng, Pauline Larrouy-Maestri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zofia Anna HołubowskaMax-Planck-Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-1113-4509
Xiangbin TengDepartment of Psychology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5360-4957
Pauline Larrouy-MaestriMax-Planck-Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

Improvement on Competitiveness in Hiring New Faculties Funding Scheme, the Chinese University of Hong Kong 4937113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When listening to music or speech, people naturally divide continuous sound streams into segments for easier and faster processing of information. The segmentation boundaries are not random. Listeners agree on the points of segmentation, which are consistent with arbitrary rules-for example, those established by music theory-and often occur at regular time intervals. It is thus unclear whether phrase tracking relies on understanding of musical structure or merely on temporal predictability. To address this, we examined how non-musicians process both regular (temporally predictable) and irregular musical phrases derived from J.S. Bach's compositions. This approach preserved authentic musical structure while manipulating temporal predictability. We also included control stimuli matched in acoustic properties but lacking musical structure. Behavioral and EEG measures revealed that listeners could accurately detect phrase boundaries in both regular and irregular conditions. Neural activity, indexed by an increase in low-frequency EEG power, reflected the tracking structural boundaries regardless of temporal regularity. These findings demonstrate that musical segmentation depends fundamentally on implicit understanding of musical structure, rather than on temporal predictability alone.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionBrainMusicAcoustic StimulationAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultEEGmusic perceptionmusic structureneural trackingphrase segmentation

Identifiers

PMID41968537
PMCPMC13071237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.